SECOND QUARTER CONSTRUCTION OUTLOOK 2010

Posted: August 2nd, 2010 | Author: hannah | Filed under: Newsletter | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

General  

After two years in the depths of one of the worst recessions in living memory, there are still very few signs of a recovery. The limited signs of some recovery over the past quarter are now in a pause mode. In the construction industry demand remains weak because of continued oversupply, developers are reluctant to commit to new projects and those prepared to take the risks are experiencing difficulty in obtaining financing.

The U.S. Department of Commerce in June, 2010 estimated an overall construction (private and public combined) “Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate” of $836.01 billion which represents a decline of 7.9% from June 2009. Even more discouraging, the value of construction put in place for the first six months of 2010 is $389.60 billion and is 11.2% less than the same period a year ago.  

Last quarter’s relatively positive outlook for residential construction is looking less rosy with the expiration of federal tax credits for first-time homeowners. Through the first five months of this year the increase in residential construction was only 4.7% above the same period last year. Last quarter a 7% increase was forecasted for 2010 after a 25% drop in 2010.

Non-residential construction continues to languish in the doldrums. Office construction for the first six months of 2010 was down 31.9% from the same period last year; commercial construction down 31.4%; manufacturing down 31.1% and lodging a massive 58.5% less than the same period of 2009.    

In public funded construction, the dollar value of construction for the first six months of 2010 was $136.94 billion compared to $144.37 billion for the same period in 2009 which represents a 5.1% decrease. A breakout of these numbers shows a 21.6% increase in public residential construction but a 5.8% decrease in public non-residential construction. These figures indicate that stimulus funds only reduced the depth of the decrease in construction activity rather than creating an increase.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the June 2010 the construction industry unemployment rate was 20.1%. Overall, there has been little change over the past four months. 

On a somewhat more positive front, the American Institute of Architects’ Architecture Billings Index for April was flat for the first time since early 2008 when billing levels started dropping. Moreover new project inquiries are somewhat on the rise. However any increase in architectural workload will only translate into an increase in construction activity in 2011. 

A further small positive sign of improving conditions is the ENR Construction Industry Confidence Index for the second quarter of 2010, which rose 7 points from the first quarter of 2010. 

Construction Cost

The July 15 Producer Price Index Report of the U.S. Labor Department shows that after three months of construction material cost increases, it fell by 1.9 % in June 2010. Overall, prices are still up 0.8 % for the second quarter of the year and 4.2% higher than a year ago.

Concrete products fell 0.2% in June but were unchanged for the second quarter and 2% from the same time a year ago. Lumber prices, which had been rising monthly since October 2009, showed a 9% decrease last month but an overall 1.3% decrease for the quarter and a 21.9 % increase from June 2009.  Structural metal fabricated goods are slightly up for June, up 1.6% for the quarter and 1.3 % higher on a year on year basis.

Increases in construction labor rates are much lower than in the past. The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ latest release shows a 2.48% increase in average hourly rates between June 2009 and June 2010.

From an overall construction cost viewpoint, greatly increased competition between suppliers, sub-contractors and contractors over the past two years have resulted in each party reducing overhead and profit margins thus reducing bid prices and leading to moderate to strong construction price deflation. During the past quarter residential cost started to inch up from historical lows but that has been stalled with the expiration of federal tax credits for first-time home buyers. Costs for non-residential construction markets have bottomed out and there are no signs of upward movement because of the very low demand.

Because of the lack of new projects, competitive bidding remains the most cost efficient procurement method. However, the risks in terms of quality and increased change orders must be managed. In addition there will be risks of contractor/subcontractor insolvency.

Overall Construction Escalation Outlook

The slight improvement in the overall economy in the second quarter of 2010 has stalled, appearing to be on pause and the future is still uncertain. The large reduction in overall construction activity continues to greatly increase competition between bidders and put pricing pressure on projects. Costs have generally bottomed out and are 8% to 10% below their peak in 2008.

The somewhat more optimistic outlook from the construction design professionals is encouraging but projects on the drawing boards will only translate to construction activities in 2011. 

In the short term, bid prices are likely to remain low due to the very weak demand and lower input costs. In the longer term, it is likely the construction market will have a slow recovery only from the second half of 2011.

The most likely escalation scenario is an uneven slow recovery over the next three or four years.  We predict a slightly negative to static second half of 2010, a static 2011, a 1% – 1.5% escalation in 2012 and a return to a manageable 2% – 3% per annum thereafter.


FIRST QUARTER CONSTRUCTION OUTLOOK 2010

Posted: February 5th, 2010 | Author: hannah | Filed under: Newsletter | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

While there are signs that the broader economy appears to be emerging from the depths of recession, there is little sign that there is any momentum towards a recovery for the construction industry.  The U.S. Department of Commerce in November estimated an overall construction “put-in-place” decline of 10% for 2009 and forecasted a further decline of 2% for 2010.

The federal figures indicate a somewhat more positive outlook for residential construction with a forecasted 7% increase in 2010 after a 25% drop in 2009.  On the opposite side of the spectrum, commercial construction shows a forecasted 25% decrease in 2010 after a 32% decrease in 2009.  Office construction is forecasted to decrease 22% in 2010 after a 20% decrease in 2009.

Over 1.7 million construction jobs have been lost since the peak monthly employment in the summer of 2006.

In public funded construction there is a 6.1 percent increase over the past year.  Given the depth of the recession in the construction industry, stimulus funds may only be sufficient to reduce the depth of the cuts in employment rather than creating an increase.

The demands for “private sector, small firms” in qualifying for federal, state or city projects is extremely onerous and subsequently stimulus funds will tend to feed the larger companies with previous public sector experience.

Demand for new construction in the commercial sector is very low – many areas remain overbuilt, and it will be some time before the excess is absorbed.

New commercial development is further hampered by non availability of financing for new developments.  In a survey conducted by ENR involving 941 construction firms, the single biggest complaint is the lack of bank financing for projects no matter how investment-worthy the projects.

Construction Cost

The cost of construction materials has seen significant fluctuation over the past two years. The major indexes all show a peak in 2008 followed by a 5.6% decline in 2009.  ENR is projecting a further 1.9% decline in 2010.

Looking at individual materials, however, there are a wide variety of profiles.  Steel has shown a sharp decline of some 30% from its peak and ENR expects it to decline another 4.8% in 2010.  Lumber has fallen steadily from a peak in 2004 and will get an initial boost in the first half of 2010 as the housing market improves and is forecasted to end 2010 at 5.2% higher.  Cement prices have fallen steadily in 2008 and 2009 and is likely to fall further as consumption is forecasted by the Portland Cement Association to slip another 0.7% after plunging 50.3% in 2009.

Labor costs are showing no significant reductions but rather the rate of increase are much lower than in the past.  The Construction Labor Research Council, Washington, DC reports that the average negotiated increase for 2010 is 3.6% which is well below the average of 4.6% in 2008.

From an overall construction cost viewpoint, greatly increased competition between suppliers, sub-contractors and contractors have resulted in each party reducing overhead and profit margins thus reducing bid prices and leading to moderate to strong construction price deflation. Overall construction cost indexes reflect that selling cost of construction on year to year basis declined between 7% and 10% and are at 2006 levels.

The most cost efficient procurement method would be to introduce some form of competitive bidding.  However, this comes with risks in terms of quality and increased change orders and the possibility of contractor/subcontractor insolvency.

Overall Construction Escalation Outlook

The large reduction in overall construction activity is leading to greatly increased competition between bidders and putting downward pricing pressure on projects.  In most areas cost trends continue to be sharply negative, leading to moderate to strong construction price deflation.

In the short term, bid prices are likely to remain low due to the very weak demand and lower input costs.  In the longer term, the outlook is less clear.  It is likely the construction market will have a slow recovery over many years as it will take time for investment to return to the construction sector.

The most likely escalation scenario is an uneven slow recovery over the next three or four years.  We see 1% – 1.5% de-escalation in 2010, a static 2011, a 1% – 1.5% escalation in 2012 and a return to a manageable 2% – 3% per annum thereafter.


Pro-Cost Merry Christmas

Posted: December 16th, 2009 | Author: Noreen | Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Christmas illustration


SECOND QUARTER CONSTRUCTION OUTLOOK 2009

Posted: September 10th, 2009 | Author: admin | Filed under: Newsletter | Tags: , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

A QUANTITY SURVEYOR’S PERSPECTIVE – NEWSLETTER
SECOND QUARTER CONSTRUCTION OUTLOOK 2009

September 10, 2009

The second quarter of 2009 has seen some signs of the recession slowing in a few non-construction sectors. Construction still remains in a downturn as funding for projects is still very difficult obtain, keeping construction growth and employment in decline. It is forecasted that the construction market will continue on a downward trend through the end of 2009, but the intensity of the downward spiral is easing and should level off by December 2009.

Nonresidential construction projects are currently limited to State and Federal projects financed with the Federal stimulus packages. These contracts are beginning to start work, which has allowed civil construction to remain at or near levels reported in the first quarter of 2009. It is projected that costs for this sector of the construction industry will remain stable with the only changes coming from the unions in contract increases and with minimal increases in materials beginning the first quarter of 2010.

Material pricing has fallen to levels seen in December 2007, prior to the wild climbs in 2008, and are projected to show a slight increase in the first quarter of 2010. Steel prices are still in decline for the second quarter of 2009 despite steel mills pushing for a 22% increase to take the pricing back to where it was in the first quarter of 2009. The overall demand remains low as nonresidential construction starts are down, and construction spending has dropped 6% since the start of 2009 and by the end of the year is projected to drop a total of 11%.

First time buyer incentives have created a slight increase in residential construction, but with foreclosures and homes rolling off the Real Estate rolls there is still an abundance of properties keeping the market prices lower than what was seen in 2008. The slight increase in residential construction has had no impact on nonresidential construction or materials pricing.

The increased competition between contractors will help dampen previous strong upward pressure from sub-contractor pricing, a major escalation driver in some markets, while the drop in commodity prices will assist in reducing material costs nationwide. Further, lower material costs and overhead may make previously uneconomic projects more attractive if funding becomes more readily available.

In summary, the effects of the financial downturn are continuing to shift the construction industry from an abundance of activity with insufficient capacity to a reduction in activity with over capacity. The resulting increase in competition, in conjunction with declining costs of materials, will see no escalation increases in 2009 and are projected to remain flat until the second half of 2010.


FIRST QUARTER CONSTRUCTION OUTLOOK 2009

Posted: January 16th, 2009 | Author: admin | Filed under: Newsletter | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

A QUANTITY SURVEYOR’S PERSPECTIVE – NEWSLETTER
FIRST QUARTER CONSTRUCTION OUTLOOK 2009

January 16, 2009

The speed and scope of the events in September and October 2008 were startling. The national economy and indeed the whole world are now feeling the full force of the financial crisis that is now causing collateral damage in virtually every industry and resulted in the U.S. economy being in a recession. Moreover the problem is worldwide as Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Latin America all struggle.

The 2008 mid-year peaks in base metal prices, oil, and other construction related commodities coincided with the drying up of capital availability due to the spreading financial crisis, threatening what had been strong demand in the non-residential construction markets. Investors have been running scared from any debt backed by loans to apartment buildings, office space or warehouses, freezing financing for new projects.

Inflation peaked during the first half of 2008 with both steel and oil prices soaring to record levels despite a subprime mortgage crisis that was destroying the housing industry. But with the financial crisis during the last quarter of 2008 when the full extent of the financial crisis started to reveal itself and with banks, insurance companies, Wall Street investment firms and the automotive industry all lining up for bailouts, commodity prices started to tumble. Oil prices fell from over $140 per barrel to less than $70. Steel prices also started to head down and are expected to keep falling through in the foreseeable future especially as demand for scrap metal from China has declined dramatically. Structural-steel prices fell 15% in the last quarter of 2008 and prices are expected to decline another 20% by the second quarter of 2009 before firming.

During 2008 when the housing market was particularly hard hit, workers turned to “non-residential building” for construction jobs. New commercial construction that continued at a steady pace helped cushion job losses that would have been more severe. With the abrupt halt in commercial projects in September, unemployment started to soar, and will undermine wage negotiations in 2009. In November 2008, the U.S. Dept. of Labor reported construction’s unemployment rate was 12.7%, more than double what it was a year ago. For all of 2008, 632,000 jobs, or 8.5 percent, were lost in total construction
For single-family housing, declines are continuing and showing no sign of an upturn. Home prices are continuing to drop—a 20 percent drop in 2008 with an expected further 10 percent decline through the first half of 2009. Thereafter, things should level off. Store construction has taken the biggest hit with an estimated 30 percent decline in retail square footage starts this year.”

In the near term, we are likely to experience a continued downward spiral with job losses, reduced construction volume, investor and lender fright and as the employment data and other statistics continue to reflect the ongoing, seemingly limitless retrenchment in economic activity, the chances for a major stimulus package emerging from the incoming Obama administration and the new Congress improves. However, the increased competition between contractors will help dampen previous strong upward pressure from sub-contractor pricing, a major escalation driver in some markets, while the continuing sharp drop in commodity prices will assist in reducing material costs nationwide. Further, significantly lower labor and materials costs may make previously uneconomic projects more attractive.

In summary, the effects of the global financial downturn are shifting the construction industry from an abundance of activity with insufficient capacity to a reduction in activity with over capacity. The resulting increase in competition, in conjunction with declining costs of materials, will see no escalation increases in 2009. In fact there could be a 2% to 3 % drop in the first half of 2009 followed by a corresponding increase in the latter half of the year resulting in a net zero for the year.


Procost saves you money!

Posted: July 14th, 2008 | Author: MKippen | Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Procost was featured in the Puget Sound Business Journal last year – “As construction expenses rise, Pro-Cost thrives”. – http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2008/07/14/story15.html

[From Puget Sound Business Journal]

Rising construction costs are a boon for Bellevue-based Pro-Cost, which has seen its revenue more than quadruple recently. Soaring construction expenses have big-box retailers, developers and banks turning to Pro-Cost for help in estimating and managing construction budgets.

Founded in 2004, Pro-Cost helps clients estimate how much it will cost to renovate an existing building or build a new one. Then the company helps clients manage their costs during construction.

The firm is currently overseeing projects totaling approximately $3 billion, Pro-Cost co-founder and CEO Rod Kippen said. He expects revenue of about $3.5 million this year, up from $600,000 in 2004. To handle its swelling business, Pro-Cost has doubled in size to 25 employees, with the firm looking to hire another 10 or so staffers by early next year, Kippen said.

More than half of the small Bellevue firm’s work comes from big-box retailers that include Costco, Home Depot and Target, among others.

Pro-Cost also helped Seattle insurer Safeco Corp. compare the cost of renovating its longtime University District headquarters with relocating to downtown Seattle.

Kippen said about 10 percent of the firm’s business is related to legal disputes and forensic audits. The remainder of the company’s business comes from a range of clients that includes hospitals, assisted-living facilities, prisons and municipalities.

Too often, Kippen said, clients wait until after they have gone through design review to prepare a construction budget. Then, when they finally do contact their contractor, the expenses are too high and they have to go back and rework the design, adding to project costs.

Only about a dozen of the projects Pro-Cost is handling are in Washington state. The rest are scattered across the United States and Canada. The company has an office in the Washington, D.C., area and is considering adding another office in Atlanta, Kippen said.

In addition to Kippen, Pro-Cost principals include his wife, Noreen, Edward Hing and Jeremy Goeckeritz. The Kippens and Hing emigrated to the United States from South Africa, where “quantity surveyors” — essentially construction economists — must earn advanced degrees and pass board exams.

Pro-Cost provides a range of services, including estimating construction costs, managing projects to budget, auditing the cost of making changes and testifying as expert witnesses.

Currently, Kippen is serving as an expert witness in a dispute in New Orleans between Circuit City and its landlord over damages sustained when Hurricane Katrina devastated the city.

Thanks to the tightening credit markets, Pro-Cost has also seen a rise in its work with local lenders. The company monitors construction loans for area lenders and reviews construction costs on completed projects.

Pro-Cost gets a construction report from a local lender and reviews the budget to see if it will cover projected costs. Pro-Cost then monitors the construction budget on a monthly basis, reviewing change orders to make sure items are being charged correctly.

Kippen is grateful for the surge in business.

“Our 10 years in America are such a blessing,” Kippen said. “We are living proof the American Dream is very much a reality.”

 

JLJ@BIZJOURNALS.COM | 206.876.5426


E-mail Pro-Cost